Appendix 3

Registered Housing Provider update - Vale

Purpose of this appendix

1.    To meet the requirements of the Housing Delivery Action Plan, items 1.5 and 1.8, as prescribed by the Housing Delivery Strategy.

2.    To provide Cabinet with an update on information gathered from Registered Housing Providers (RPs).

Background

3.    The Housing Delivery Strategy, and associated action plans, approved by Cabinet on 11 November 2022, requires that the council and Register Providers (RPs) of social and affordable housing with stock in the area are working closely together.

4.    A request was made to known RPs operating the districts for information.  This has been collated into the following general data which should be used for strategic purposes. It is not the aim of this data to identify specific properties, locations, issues or RPs, although where there are specific concerns, this will be addressed by housing officers.  In addition it is possible that this information is incomplete as other RPs have not provided information, or have not been approached.  Therefore the information will continue to evolve, and will be reviewed and updated on a periodic basis.

Housing stock data

5.    It is important to ensure that the council has the most accurate information on the number, size and location of existing RP housing stock in the district.  This can be used to confirm that specific properties are social/affordable housing, and who the landlord is; to enable a quicker and more direct resolution to enquiries; and to enable the development of relevant strategies.  To this end, a request was made to supply the following stock data.  The detailed stock data will not be shared with other RPs, or outside of the council, unless by agreement.

·         Location (address)

·         Number of bedrooms

·         Approximate age of construction

·         Adapted

·         Types (house, flat etc)

6.    RPs store information in different ways and therefore information received was not complete in all fields and required some data manipulation to create a data set for analysis.

7.    The number of sites by each RP in the district that responded to the request for information breaks down as follows.

Registered Providers

No of Properties

Aster

307

BPHA

43

Clarion

309

Hastoe

3

L&G

157

OCLT

8

Peabody

207

Silva

195

Sovereign

6503

Stonewater

250

Grand Total

7982

 

8.    The number of bedrooms is important, and the number of properties in each area with between 0 (bedsits) to 6 bedrooms is as follows.

No of 1 bed

No of 2 bed

No of 3 bed

No of 4 bed

Unknown

No of 5 bed

1527

3256

2850

239

100

9

 

9.    The type of property is shown in the chart below.

Maisonettes

Flats

Houses

Bungalows

Unknown

133

2085

4817

921

17

 

10.The types of tenure are also important.

Social rent

Affordable Rent

Shared ownership

General needs

Assured

Unknown tenure

5048

1653

630

244

50

357

 

11. The reason for any discrepancies in totals between the tables is because the council relies upon data spreadsheets provided by RPs, and not all fields may be completed by all RPs for all properties. This, and the fact that properties are being bought, built and sold on a frequent basis means that the data should only ever be used as a strategic guide rather than 100% accurate numbers.